Our hosts, law professor Ilan Wurman and Kathryn Johnson, start off discussing the Virginia Redistricting case. What did the state supreme court hold? What is an "election"? Is there a federal question for the U.S. Supreme Court to review? Are the Democrats flipping 180 on a bunch of issues to get their way, including the meaning of "election day" and the independent state legislature doctrine? Our hosts then turn to the five-court circuit split surrounding the mandatory detention of illegal aliens. What is an "applicant for admission"? Is an applicant for admission necessarily "seeking" admission? And what does Judge Lagoa's Eleventh Circuit dissent tell us about birthright citizenship? Enjoy this textual and interpretive bonanza.

Be sure to LIKE, SHARE, COMMENT, and SUBSCRIBE to rationally BASED!

Subscribe to our Substack!

New Podcast Episodes every Thursday morning, find us on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or on YouTube!

Follow us on social media on Instagram, X, Facebook, and TikTok!

Our hosts, law professor Ilan Wurman and Kathryn Johnson, cover everything Voting Rights Act in light of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Louisiana v. Callais. Why was the Voting Rights Act enacted, and how does it relate to the Fifteenth Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment? What did the VRA accomplish? What did the Supreme Court do with Section 5 of the VRA in Shelby County, and was that case rightly decided? Is redistricting even covered by the language of the VRA? If it is covered, would that even be constitutional if the Fourteenth Amendment covers only civil rights, rather than political rights? How has the VRA been interpreted since it was held to cover redistricting? Ilan and Kathryn talk about the "Democrat Movement Lawyer" theory of the VRA, which required what Kathryn calls "Dem Maxxing" -- maximizing the political power of Democrats. The Supreme Court in Callais, Ilan argues, merely scuttled this crazy interpretation of the VRA, restoring it to its original and intended purposes.

Be sure to LIKE, SHARE, COMMENT, and SUBSCRIBE to rationally BASED!

Subscribe to our Substack!

New Podcast Episodes every Thursday morning, find us on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or on YouTube!

Follow us on social media on Instagram, X, Facebook, and TikTok!

Our hosts, law professor Ilan Wurman and Kathryn Johnson, get a full hour with Mollie Hemingway, editor-in-chief of The Federalist and author of the new New York Times bestseller, Alito: The Justice Who Reshaped the Supreme Court and Restored the Constitution. They touch on several themes in the book and connect them to current issues and news. Is Alito an originalist? What is a "practical originalist"? Why did he make fun of Justice Scalia, saying he wanted to know what James Madison thought about video games? What do the attacks on Alito show us about the Left's strategy and tactics more broadly? What is "demosprudence"? The "Greenhouse effect"? And what's the Shadow Docket? Our hosts then talk with Mollie about the recent Voting Rights Act decision, about election integrity more generally, and here takeaway from the birthright citizenship oral arguments, which she attended. Enjoy and please like and subscribe!

Be sure to LIKE, SHARE, COMMENT, and SUBSCRIBE to rationally BASED!

Subscribe to our Substack!

New Podcast Episodes every Thursday morning, find us on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or on YouTube!

Follow us on social media on Instagram, X, Facebook, and TikTok!