In Episode 313 of The Block Runner Podcast, William and I-man break down the latest stress test for crypto launch platforms: Believe’s rapid rise, the Printer token ICO backlash, the $2M refund, and what the failed attempts to disrupt Pump.Fun reveal about launching in a permissionless market.

The conversation centers on how quickly community momentum can reverse when a platform moves too fast into tokenization, why founders face extreme psychological pressure once market attention arrives, and why examples like Believe, Heaven, Bonk-adjacent launch efforts, and Printer matter directly to the NAT.fun launch thesis.

Key topics:

1. Believe’s position in the launch ecosystem and how quickly market attention can concentrate around a new platform
2. The Printer ICO, Coinbase/Sonar rails, and why selling a token too early can reverse community sentiment
3. The mental-health pressure founders face when crypto Twitter turns from attention into personal attack
4. The $2M refund and what it says about trust, timing, and execution in token launches
5. Why attempts to disrupt Pump.Fun keep failing, from Believe to Heaven to Printer
6. How these failures become direct lessons for NAT.fun as it prepares to enter the launch-platform arena

Please like and subscribe on your favorite podcasting app!

Sign up for a free newsletter: www.theblockrunner.com

Follow us on:

Youtube: https://bit.ly/TBlkRnnrYouTube

Twitter: bit.ly/TBR-Twitter

Telegram: bit.ly/TBR-Telegram

Discord: bit.ly/TBR-Discord

$NAT Telegram: https://t.me/dmt_nat

In Episode 312 of The Block Runner Podcast, hosts William, I-man, and TJ unpack a wild week for $NAT: overnight listings on three centralized exchanges with zero fees paid, a god-candle to a $150M market cap, and a deeper, more rigorous walk-through of the Bitcoin security-budget math than the show has ever done on-air. They run the numbers through Michael Saylor's $441 trillion scenario, show why fees can't close the gap, and lay out the case for NAT as a supplementary second subsidy capable of delivering $2.1B/day to miners. The episode closes with a commitment: the next video from The Block Runner is NAT.fun going live.

Disclosure: William and I-man are founders of NAT.fun and hold NAT tokens. All analysis in this episode reflects their perspective as participants in the ecosystem.

Key topics:

1. NAT token listed on MEXC, LBank, and CoinEx overnight — a fourth exchange followed the next day — with no listing fees paid, consistent with Constantinople-era organic exchange adoption
2. The god-candle: NAT market cap to ~$150M in an instant, flipping ORDI; hosts normalize expectations to a new ~$40–$60M floor with extreme volatility still ahead
3. Bankless on the Bitcoin security budget: Justin Drake's ultrasound-money framing, why "add tail issuance or move to proof-of-stake" is not a viable answer for Bitcoin
4. The full math walkthrough: at $100T market cap in 30 years, Bitcoin delivers only $116K per block — roughly half of today's $243K — a ~0.00006% security-to-value ratio
5. Running it through Michael Saylor's $441T scenario: five halvings out, Bitcoin still delivers only $2M/block and spends 0.0002% of its market cap on security — 100x below the U.S. 3.4% GDP-to-security benchmark
6. Why "fees will cover it" doesn't math out: $10,781 per transaction, every block, every day, forever, to approximate a U.S.-equivalent security ratio on a $100T BTC
7. NAT as a second subsidy: decoupled from Bitcoin's exponential decay, earned by miners alongside BTC, and still delivering in 2140 when subsidy hits zero
8. The efficiency comparison: at a $15T NAT market cap paired with Saylor's $441T BTC, NAT delivers ~$285M/block — 100x more than BTC at the same point in time
9. The on-air correction and the natgmi.com slider: at $1T NAT, miners receive $15M/block — 7x Bitcoin's current efficiency — or $2.1B/day
10. Why the hosts can't be the messengers: the token-founder conflict and the need for a neutral Andreas-style explainer to carry the math to Bitcoin's mainstream
11. NAT.fun preview and network-effect thesis: why the launch platform's success underwrites NAT's long-run demand, and why the hosts are going silent until it ships — the next video IS the launch

Do the math yourself. If you arrive somewhere different, bring it into the comments.

Please like and subscribe on your favorite podcasting app!

Sign up for a free newsletter: www.theblockrunner.com

Follow us on:

Youtube: https://bit.ly/TBlkRnnrYouTube

Twitter: bit.ly/TBR-Twitter

Telegram: bit.ly/TBR-Telegram

Discord: bit.ly/TBR-Discord

$NAT Telegram: https://t.me/dmt_nat

In Episode 311 of The Block Runner Podcast, hosts William and I-man discuss SpiderPool's historic distribution of both Bitcoin and NAT tokens to pool participants, dive deep into the mathematical impossibility of Bitcoin's long-term security budget, and break down why the NAT token is the only viable solution. They also preview the imminent launch of NAT.fun, a new NFT platform built on Bitcoin block production data.

Key topics:

1. SpiderPool — the 5th largest Bitcoin miner — officially begins distributing both BTC and NAT to pool participants, marking a historic first and validating months of anticipation
2. Bitcoin's security budget math crisis: why the X-squared price growth requirement is mathematically impossible and what the halving subsidy trajectory means for decentralization by 2140
3. NAT token as Bitcoin's only viable supplemental subsidy: 60% of global hash power already backing it, and how $1,000/block at $1B market cap reaches fee parity — 1,400x below Bitcoin's current valuation
4. Skeptics and scoffers in the Bitcoin ecosystem — why the CMO of Brains laughed at SpiderPool's announcement and why that pattern of dismissal has a well-documented historical cost in crypto
5. NAT.fun platform preview: how the viability-test launch mechanism (bonding curve + graduation) on Solana uses Bitcoin block production data to revive NFTs with a sustainable creator economics model
6. Quantum computing vs. economic attack vectors on Bitcoin — why $24B to attack Bitcoin for one hour is nothing compared to nation-state security budgets of $500B-$1T/year
7. The grain-of-sand thought experiment: why Bitcoin's exponential price growth requirement correlates to pricing every grain of sand on Earth at $700
8. NAT.fun and its role in the broader Bitcoin ecosystem revival, including a brief Ordinals market resurgence signal

Like, subscribe, and drop a comment with your take on whether the NAT token can actually solve Bitcoin's long-term security problem.

Please like and subscribe on your favorite podcasting app!

Sign up for a free newsletter: www.theblockrunner.com

Follow us on:

Youtube: https://bit.ly/TBlkRnnrYouTube

Twitter: bit.ly/TBR-Twitter

Telegram: bit.ly/TBR-Telegram

Discord: bit.ly/TBR-Discord

$NAT Telegram: https://t.me/dmt_nat