I focus on recent developments in the State of Utah v. Tyler Robinson case, where Robinson stands accused of killing Charlie Kirk. A key theme that emerges was a recent court decision in which Judge Graf denied the defense's request to subpoena Twigs, Robinson's out-of-state roommate, to testify in person during the preliminary hearing.

The discussion explores the difference between preliminary hearings and trials, the role of remote testimony post-COVID, and the implications of using recorded statements instead of live cross-examination at this early stage.

Several points were raised, including the procedures and rights involved in preliminary hearings, grand juries, and the importance of the confrontation clause at trial.

FAQ's

Why did the judge deny the defense's request to have Twigs testify in person during the preliminary hearing?

The judge denied the defense request because the defense did not provide a compelling reason for requiring Twigs's in-person testimony at the preliminary hearing, and the rules of evidence—like confrontation rights—typically do not apply at this stage. Instead, the judge allowed the use of Twig's recorded statement as sufficient for determining probable cause.

What is the difference between a preliminary hearing and a grand jury indictment in the Charlie Kirk case?

A preliminary hearing is an open court proceeding where the prosecutor presents evidence to establish probable cause, allowing the defense to observe and cross-examine witnesses, while a grand jury indictment is a secret process where the defense has no right to be present or participate. In the Charlie Kirk case, the preliminary hearing determines whether the case proceeds, whereas a grand jury would issue an indictment without defense involvement.

Can the defense cross-examine key witnesses like Twigs during the preliminary hearing?

No, the defense cannot cross-examine key witnesses like Twigs during the preliminary hearing if their testimony is presented as a recorded statement and the judge does not enforce their appearance. The right to cross-examine is typically reserved for the trial stage, not for preliminary hearings, as discussed in the episode.

Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!

Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.

Recorded at Channel 511.

Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.

Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.

He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.

Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.

For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense.

Copyright 2026 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

Mentioned in this episode:

Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants

Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Are you struggling with a difficult neighbor and wondering about your legal options? I address a listener's question about whether you can get a civil protection or "stay away" order against your neighbor in Ohio. Here are three key takeaways from that conversation:

• Not All Bad Behavior Qualifies: Protection orders aren't granted just because neighbors are unfriendly or use offensive language. Verbal insults, dirty looks, or general unpleasantness usually aren't enough for the court to intervene.
• High Legal Threshold: To succeed with a civil stalking protection order, you must show a pattern of conduct that causes significant emotional distress—so severe it could require psychological treatment. Imminent threats of physical harm are judged by even stricter standards.
• Consider Mediation: Because neighbors usually must continue living near each other, courts rarely force one party to move. Mediation or other forms of alternative dispute resolution are often better solutions than legal action.

FAQ's about Civil Protection

Can I get a civil protection order against my neighbor in Ohio?

In Ohio, you can seek a civil stalking protection order if a neighbor's repeated actions cause you significant distress, but courts rarely grant them for typical neighbor quarrels unless the behavior meets a high threshold of harm or threat. Just unfriendly relations or name-calling are usually not enough for an order.

How should you handle ongoing disputes with a neighbor, causing stress?

If ongoing neighbor disputes are stressful, Steve Palmer suggests mediation or finding a way to resolve things outside of court, since you'll likely have to live near each other for years. Courts recommend mediation because protection orders between neighbors are tough to enforce and are rarely granted without severe or threatening conduct.

Why is it difficult to get a court order forcing a neighbor to move?

It is difficult to get a court order forcing a neighbor to move because the law does not permit that based on mere neighbor disagreements or unfriendly behavior. As Steve Palmer explains, courts will not make someone sell their home simply due to neighborhood squabbles or discomfort.

Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!

Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.

Recorded at Channel 511.

Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.

Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.

He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.

Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.

For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense.

Copyright 2026 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

Mentioned in this episode:

Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants

Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Do you need to inform your parole officer about contact with law enforcement, especially if you’re nearing the end of your parole in a different county or state?

The conversation focuses on distinguishing between terms like probation and parole (and their modern equivalents, such as community control and post-release control in Ohio) while exploring the complexities of compliance across jurisdictions.

Key takeaways:

• Always Review Your Parole Terms: Nearly all parole agreements require you to notify your parole officer of any law enforcement contact, regardless of how close you are to completing your term 02:50.
• Violations Must Be Filed Before Parole Ends: Action for parole violations generally must occur before your parole term expires—post-termination, the window to file a formal complaint closes 04:03.
• Seek Legal Counsel Early: Instead of taking risks or relying on “not getting caught,” consult a lawyer promptly to navigate any complex or ambiguous situations that may arise 05:04.

FAQ's about parole

What is the difference between probation, parole, community control, and post-release control in Ohio?

In Ohio, probation is now called community control and applies when a judge suspends prison and oversees you outside of incarceration, while parole (now called post-release control) starts after you serve prison time and are released under supervision. Each has different terms, but they all involve strict conditions and possible return to prison for violations [01:25, 02:04].

Do you have to tell your parole officer if police question you, even if your parole is almost over?

Yes, almost every parole (or probation/community control) condition requires reporting all law enforcement contact to your parole officer, no matter how close you are to finishing parole or where you are located [03:02, 03:14].

What should someone do if they're unsure about reporting law enforcement contact while on parole?

The best approach is to get a lawyer for specific legal advice, as ignoring the obligation can risk parole revocation, and authorities often check with parole officers before or after law enforcement contact occurs [05:04, 05:10].

Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!

Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.

Recorded at Channel 511.

Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.

Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.

He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.

Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.

For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense.

Copyright 2026 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

Mentioned in this episode:

Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants

Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Just tackled a great listener question on our latest Q&A segment of Lawyer Talk! The topic? "Fighting words"—and whether using particularly nasty insults can actually justify or excuse an assault in court.

Here are three key takeaways from the episode:

• Assault & Fighting Words: As Steve Palmer explains, simply hearing "fighting words" rarely justifies assault charges being thrown out. The answer is typically no, though there are rare exceptions. Steve Palmer details this at 00:28.
• Supreme Court Precedent: The famous Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire case addressed whether some words are so inflammatory that they lose First Amendment protection. While the Supreme Court upheld criminalizing certain "fighting words," later cases have narrowed this doctrine in favor of free speech. More insights from Steve Palmer at 01:19.
• First Amendment in Schools: Even students don’t “check their constitutional rights at the door.” Tinker v. Des Moines affirmed that students retain free speech rights at school—an important point for both educators and parents (Steve Palmer at 02:19).

FAQ's

What are "fighting words," and how does U.S. law treat them?

"Fighting words" are certain highly offensive words that the Supreme Court has ruled can sometimes be criminalized, though most speech — even insulting speech — is generally protected by the First Amendment. Steve Palmer explains that while early cases allowed some restrictions, more recent rulings have limited the fighting words doctrine and protected most speech.

Can using extremely offensive language legally justify assault charges being dropped?

According to Steve Palmer, assault is generally not legally justified by the use of fighting words alone. While some rare cases might see an assault charge affected by the presence of extreme insults, most of the time the law does not excuse physical actions based on words.

Do students have First Amendment rights in public schools according to Supreme Court rulings?

Steve Palmer cites the Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines, clarifying that students in public schools do retain their First Amendment rights. This means students don’t lose constitutional protections to free speech simply by entering a school building.

Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!

Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.

Recorded at Channel 511.

Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.

Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.

He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.

Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.

For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense.

Copyright 2026 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

Mentioned in this episode:

Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants

Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

As boating season arrives in Ohio, it’s important to recognize that operating a boat under the influence of alcohol is both illegal and dangerous. The law treats boating while intoxicated (BUI/BWI) very similarly to driving under the influence, and enforcement is stricter than most people realize.

Three key takeaways:

• The Law Applies on Water Too: Just like with cars, operating a boat with a blood alcohol level of 0.08% or higher—or appearing impaired—can result in charges under Ohio Revised Code 1547.11. This includes not just motorboats, but also jet skis, canoes, kayaks, and even water skis.
• "Underway" is Broadly Defined: You don’t need to have the engine running to be considered "operating" a boat. If you’re drifting (not anchored or docked), you’re still subject to boating while intoxicated laws.
• Safety is Critical: Boating under the influence increases the risk of serious accidents, including fatalities. Always designate a sober operator, especially on dangerous bodies of water like Lake Erie.

Enjoy your time on the water—just make sure to do it safely and legally.

FAQ's About Boating and Drinking

What does boating while intoxicated mean in Ohio, and how is it enforced?

Boating while intoxicated in Ohio means operating any watercraft with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08% or higher, or while visibly impaired, with enforcement by ODNR officers and local authorities who watch for suspicious behavior like drinking from red solo cups and operating erratically.

How can someone avoid getting charged with boating under the influence on Ohio lakes?

To avoid getting charged, ensure the boat operator does not consume alcohol, avoid acting suspiciously or recklessly, and be aware that simply drifting or being underway counts as "operating," especially in areas where alcohol is banned, such as certain state parks.

Why is operating a boat under the influence considered so dangerous?

Operating a boat under the influence is particularly dangerous because it impairs judgment and reaction time on unpredictable waters, putting yourself, passengers, and others at serious risk — boating accidents involving alcohol can quickly turn fatal, as illustrated by firsthand experiences on Lake Erie.

Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!

Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.

Recorded at Channel 511.

Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.

Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.

He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.

Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.

For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense.

Copyright 2026 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

Mentioned in this episode:

Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants

Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com