How Peer Benchmarking Inflates Executive Pay

Failed to add items

Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping cart is already at capacity.

Add to basket failed.

Please try again later

Add to wishlist failed.

Please try again later

Remove from wishlist failed.

Please try again later

Adding to library failed

Please try again

Follow podcast failed

Unfollow podcast failed

How Peer Benchmarking Inflates Executive Pay

Listen for free

View show details

Lucas and Luna explore how companies use peer-group benchmarking to justify ever-higher executive compensation. Lucas explains the mechanics: firms select a set of 'comparable' companies, then target pay at the 50th or 75th percentile of that group. The twist? Firms cherry-pick peers that pay more, creating a self-perpetuating upward spiral. Luna brings data from a 2025 study by the Institute for Executive Compensation Analysis showing that CEOs at companies using peer benchmarking earn 22% more than those at firms that don't, even after controlling for size and industry. They discuss a concrete case: a mid-cap software company that included five larger tech firms in its peer group, jumping the CEO's target pay by 40% in two years. Lucas also notes how the SEC's 2023 pay-ratio disclosure rule has made these dynamics more visible — but hasn't changed them. The episode closes with practical advice for investors and board members on how to spot aggressive peer selection. #PeerBenchmarking #ExecutivePay #CEOCompensation #PayRatios #CompensationConsultants #SECDisclosure #SayOnPay #CorporateGovernance #BoardsOfDirectors #ProxyStatements #CompensationPhilosophy #MedianPay #TotalCompensation #Careers #Business #Finance #FexingoBusiness #BusinessPodcast Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo

No reviews yet