Commercial Litigation EP36: General update
Failed to add items
Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping cart is already at capacity.
Add to basket failed.
Please try again later
Add to wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Remove from wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Adding to library failed
Please try again
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
Summary
This is the 36th episode of our series of commercial litigation update podcasts. In this episode we discuss class actions, AI, a number of privilege cases including one of the most important decisions in that area in the past few years, and an interesting decision on service of proceedings. This episode is hosted by Maura McIntosh, a knowledge counsel in our commercial litigation team, who is joined by Julian Copeman, a disputes partner, and Tracey Lattimer, a knowledge lawyer in our disputes team.
Below you can find links to our blog posts on the developments and cases covered in this podcast.
- Law Commission to consider introduction of opt-out consumer class actions regime
- Cross-examining AI – Episode 1: Civil Justice Council AI consultation and latest developments in AI and privilege
- US courts find privilege applies to use of public AI tools by self-represented litigants
- Upper Tribunal finds privilege applied to whether Boris Johnson sought legal advice on the lawfulness of the Covid-19 lockdown
- High Court finds company could not assert privilege against former director over legal advice she had seen at the time
- High Court finds legal advice privilege is not limited to lawyer/client communications but extends to "intra-client" communications
- Court of Appeal finds English courts lack jurisdiction over sanctioned individual who is not permitted to enter the UK
See podcast episode transcript here.
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_c
No reviews yet