America Needs a Localized, Coastal Drone Defense System and State Authority Do Defend Themselves
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
Summary
In late February, the FBI warned California law enforcement that Iran had "aspired" to launch drone strikes from a vessel off the coast, in retaliation for U.S.-Israel strikes on Iran
The intelligence was unverified; the White House called for retractions and said no such threat ever existed
Newsom and local agencies issued reassuring statements and declared elevated readiness — essentially bureaucratic theater
The more serious question the episode exposed: California has no meaningful counter-drone capability of its own
Federal law restricts drone interdiction to federal agencies; state and local law enforcement cannot act independently
Experts note large Shahed-style strikes on California aren't feasible, but small modified commercial drones are a genuine, existing threat
Iran has a documented presence in Mexico and South America and now has both the drones and the motive
California needs real action: National Guard drone interdiction training, infrastructure vulnerability assessments, and pressure on Congress to expand counter-drone authority to states
Read More: https://americafirstreport.com/california-is-one-unverified-tip-away-from-realizing-it-has-no-drone-defense/
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.