How Data Scientists Use Counterfactual Explanations to Build Trust

Failed to add items

Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping cart is already at capacity.

Add to basket failed.

Please try again later

Add to wishlist failed.

Please try again later

Remove from wishlist failed.

Please try again later

Adding to library failed

Please try again

Follow podcast failed

Unfollow podcast failed

How Data Scientists Use Counterfactual Explanations to Build Trust

Listen for free

View show details

Episode 45 of The Data Science Podcast explores the emerging practice of counterfactual explanations — 'what-if' scenarios that help end users understand why a machine learning model made a particular decision. Lucas and Luna walk through a concrete example from the lending industry: a small business owner named Maria whose loan application was denied by an automated risk model. Instead of a black-box rejection, a counterfactual explanation tells her: 'If your annual revenue were $150,000 instead of $100,000, your application would have been approved.' The hosts discuss how companies like JPMorgan and Zest AI are piloting these techniques to comply with regulatory pressure and improve customer trust, and they weigh the trade-offs between fidelity and simplicity. They also touch on the computational cost of generating counterfactuals at scale and the risk of exposing sensitive model boundaries. This episode is anchored to the current regulatory landscape as of June 2026, with references to the EU's AI Act and the FTC's guidance on algorithmic fairness. #CounterfactualExplanations #ExplainableAI #MachineLearning #DataScience #LendingAlgorithms #ModelInterpretability #AITrust #RegulatoryCompliance #EUAIAct #FTC #JPMorgan #ZestAI #SmallBusinessLoans #WhatIfAnalysis #BlackBoxModels #AlgorithmicFairness #FeatureImportance #FexingoBusiness Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo

No reviews yet